Direct measurements of the prevalence of the more common forms of drug use can be
obtained from population surveys, such as the British Crime Survey (3) presented in
Tables A1-A2. However, problem drug use, in particular injecting behaviour, heroin
use and crack-cocaine is seriously under-estimated through population surveys. It is
doubtful whether it can be measured reliably because it is too rare and because of
sampling and non-response errors. For example, sub-groups of the population that are
more likely to be problem drug users are less likely to respond to population surveys
or to live in households that are sampled by population surveys.
Instead, indirect methods have been proposed as a way of Estimating Problem Drug
Use (4). A number of these studies have been carried out in a selection of London
boroughs, for example, using capture-recapture in 1992-95 for Lambeth, Southwark,
Lewisham, Newham, Camden and Islington (5). This study suggested that the prevalence
of problem drug use in areas of Inner London in the early to mid 1990s was as high as
3.3% (1 in 30 individuals) in people aged 15-49. And that the prevalence of problem
opiate use, at least, in Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham was greater than 1.0%
(1 in 100) in the same age-group. These equate to over 55,000 problem drug users,
and over 20,000 opiate users in Inner London as a whole.
Another more recent study’s estimates suggest that there were between 281,125 and
506,025 Class A problem drug users in England and Wales (15). Assuming a quarter of problem
drug users live in London based on data on numbers entering treatment and drug seizures
would give an estimate of approximately 70,000 problem drug users in London. More
reliable indications of problem drug use in London should be available later this year.
Back to top ^^
Finally, details of the latest study are below:
Estimating the Prevalence of Problematic and Injecting Drug Use for Drug Action Team Areas in England: A Feasibility Study Using the Multiple Indicator Method
A feasibility study undertaken by Frischer, Heatlie, and Hickman attempted to
estimate the prevelance of problematic and injecting drug use for Drug Action Team
Areas in England.
A Multiple Indicator Method (MIM) was used to produce prevalence estimates for
problematic and injecting drug use for Drug Action Teams (DATs) in England in 2001.
The MIM required drug indicators for all DATs and information on drug prevalence in
selected DATs. For the purposes of the project, problematic drug use was defined as
current use of illicit opiates, crack-cocaine or benzodiazepines. Injecting drug
use covers all drug use where injecting was the method of drug administration.
Eight quantitative drug indicators were obtained from the DAT template
(information collated by the Home Office) and other sources. [1: episodes of
possession of controlled drugs, 2: episodes of supply of controlled drugs, 3: adults
entering drug treatment services, 4: people arrested and referred for drug treatment,
5: drug abuse related deaths, 6: methadone prescriptions, 7: episodes of hospitalisation
for drug abuse, 8: material deprivation measured by Townsend score].
Findings
From the model developed the estimated prevalence rate of problematic drug use in
the 149 DATs varied from 0.2 per cent to 1.5 per cent of the population. The estimated
rate of injecting drug use varied from nought to one per cent of population. Overall, the
estimates for England in 2001 based on the model were:
- Rate of problematic drug use – 0.6 per cent for the total population (or 0.9% for 15- to 64-yearolds).
- Rate of injecting drug use – 0.2 per cent for the total population (or 0.3% for 15- to 64-year-olds).
Although this was a pilot project, it was large-scale in the sense that it
provided estimates for all English DATs. The study’s authors suggested that DATs be
given the opportunity to critically evaluate the estimates for their area and provide
feedback. The feedback will help in the process of developing robust estimates in future
years.
Further details can be found by clicking here.
Back to top ^^
Estimating the prevalence of problematic drug use for drug action team areas in england: a feasibility study using the multiple indicator method
This study by Hickman et al compared and developed existing indirect estimation techniques,
here we report on the capture-recapture technique, in order to estimate the prevalence of
injecting in three areas of England (Liverpool, Brighton and part of London). Estimates of the
prevalence of problem opiate use also were generated for London (and Liverpool, and in London
for problem drug and crack-cocaine use.
The estimation exercise involved collecting data about problem drug users in contact with
specialist drug treatment, arrest referral, needle exchange, and Accident and Emergency
departments, and conducting a community-recruited survey in the three areas.
Findings
The "best" estimates for London are summarised below and were obtained using covariate capture-recapture techniques - further details in main report.
Best estimates of the prevalence of injecting drug use using capture-recapture in London, including the 95 per cent confidence intervals are shown below.
Back to top ^^
Table 1
| Site |
Total Population |
Total Number of Injectors (95% CI) |
Prevalence of Injecting Drug Use (95% CI) |
| 12 London Boroughs* |
1,361,267 |
16,782 (13,793 - 21,621) |
1.20% (1.00% - 1.60%) |
| 4 Outer London |
476,411 |
2,099 (1,554 - 3,743) |
0.40% (0.30% - 0.80%) |
| 8 Inner London |
884,856 |
14,684 (10,744 - 29,203) |
1.70% (1.20% - 3.30%) |
*Boroughs of Brent, Camden, City of Westminster, Ealing, Hammersmith and Fulham, Harrow,
Hounslow, Islington, Kensington and Chelsea, Lambeth, Lewisham, Southwark
Overall, the study estimated that the prevalence of injecting drug use in those aged 15 to 44
years was 1.2 per cent in 12 London boroughs, and 1.7 per cent in the eight inner London boroughs.
The study’s authors note that prevalence is high and clearly a cause for concern, but state
that the estimates are credible, consistent with each other and fit with the available evidence
from some other public health indicators.
Table 2 shows the study’s current estimates for the number and prevalence of problem opiate
users and problem drug use and crack or cocaine use in London.
Overall, the study estimated that the prevalence of problem opiate use was 2.1 per cent in
London, and the prevalence of problem drug use and crack or cocaine use was 3.4 per cent and
0.8 per cent respectively.
The authors state that the estimates for crack/cocaine should be treated cautiously and
perhaps as minimum estimates, but that, the estimates are still an important step forward in
measuring the spread of crack cocaine use and the first for this substance in the United Kingdom
Back to top ^^
Table 2: Summary of the capture-recapture estimates for opiate, crack/cocaine and problem drug use: 2000/01
| Site |
Total Population |
Total Number of Injectors (95% CI) |
Prevalence of Injecting Drug Use (95% CI) |
| London (12 Boroughs *) |
| Opiate |
1,361,267 |
28,979 (22,368 - 43,022) |
2.1% (1.6% - 3.2%) |
| Crack/Cocaine |
1,361,267 |
11,033 (10,176 - 12,074) |
0.8% (0.7% - 0.9%) |
| Problem |
1,361,267 |
146,156 (35,326 - 64,705) |
3.4% (2.6% - 4.8%) |
* Boroughs of Brent, Camden, City of Westminster, Ealing, Hammersmith and Fulham, Harrow,
Hounslow, Islington, Kensington and Chelsea, Lambeth, Lewisham, Southwark
Further details can be found by clicking here.
Prevalence of Drug Use - Datasets & Resources
Back To Top